![]() ![]() Evaluation study designs included longitudinal studies, quantitative surveys, case study research and qualitative studies. We included papers describing interventions addressing any health issue in all populations which (a) described how a ToC approach was used to design, implement or evaluate a public health intervention or (b) described the development of a ToC for a public health intervention. In summary, we included studies of public health interventions which were defined as interventions which are intended to protect health or prevent or treat ill health in communities or populations. ![]() The inclusion and exclusion criteria are listed in Table 1. Despite some fundamental differences in their theoretical underpinnings, many of these approaches are used interchangeably or together. The development of ToC has been influenced by Freirean thinking on how to create social change by empowering individuals. These theories are often more abstract than the theories developed through ToC or logic models. Usually used post hoc, evaluators seek to uncover the underlying programme theories. Realist evaluation, on the other hand, comes from a perspective of scientific realism and focuses predominantly on the interaction between the context, mechanisms and outcomes of the programme. Similarly, although logframes were initially developed to summarise discussions with stakeholders, funder-driven formats have largely reduced logframes to a results-based management tool. For example, although logic models outline the inputs, processes, outputs and outcomes of a programme in a similar manner to ToC, they can be rigid and do not make explicit the causal pathways through which change happens in the way that ToC does. ![]() ToC differs from other theory-driven approaches to evaluation despite similar origins. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |